Appeal Court upholds judgement proscribing IPOB as a terrorist group
Justice Hamma Barka-led three-member of the Appeal Court sitting in Abuja on Thursday, affirmed the proscription of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as a terrorist organization.
The appellate court, in a unanimous decision, affirmed the judgement of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which outlawed the IPOB, adding that it found no reason to set-aside the order the Federal Government got against the group.
The court held that the federal government acted lawfully by proscribing the organization whose activities threatened the nation’s security and continued existence.
It resolved all the issues against the IPOB and dismissed its appeal for want of merit.
It will be recalled that the late former Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Abdul Abdu-Kafarati, had, in a ruling he delivered on September 15, 2017, outlawed the activities of the IPOB in Nigeria.
The prescription order followed an ex-parte motion the former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Abubakar Malami, SAN, filed on behalf of the Federal Government.
Expressly, Justice Kafafati declared illegal all activities of the group, particularly in the South-east and South-South regions of the country.
He further restrained “any person or group of persons from participating in any of the group’s activities”.
The Judge directed the AGF to ensure that he published the prescription order in the official gazette and two national dailies.
READ ALSO: “Illegal IGP”: Sowore granted N10m bail
In a follow-up ruling on January 22, 2018, the court dismissed a motion IPOB filed to challenge the legal validity of the proscription order, which it said was surreptitiously obtained by the AGF.
Dissatisfied with the decisions, the IPOB approached the appellate court to set them aside.
The organization, in its appeal marked FHC/CA/A/214/2018, which it filed through its team of lawyers led by a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, Mr. Chukwuma-Machukwu Umeh, urged the appellate court to set aside in its entirety, the ruling/final decision of the high court.
It alleged that the then AGF suppressed and misrepresented facts in the affidavit evidence he tendered before the court, maintaining that the proscription order was tantamount to declaring over 30 million Nigerians of Igbo extraction as terrorists.
Source: Vanguard newspaper
